|[ ASCILITE ]
[ 2004 Proceedings Contents ]
Deakin University has determined that every undergraduate student enrolled from 2004 will undertake at least one unit wholly online, without the usual face to face teaching that is a major component in on campus study. In response to this policy, I>Research Methods in Psychology has been developed as a wholly online unit and offered in 2004 as one of the first wholly online units to be run in the University. The design of the unit builds on the development and use of digital media and online technologies in teaching first and second year units. This paper outlines the antecedents of the unit's design and operation, along with its current wholly online teaching and learning environment. The relationship between the use of digital resources and online features is mapped against key concepts and skills to be mastered in the unit. Distinctive student attributes to be developed in relation to the subject being offered wholly online are considered. The move to new e-learning territories of wholly online environments raises important research questions. An approach to researching wholly online teaching and learning environments in the discipline of psychology is detailed as a response to illuminating key dimensions of a significant development in e-learning in higher education.
The rationale for this move relates to one of Deakin University's three core commitments informing its strategic positioning within the higher education sector, that is continuing education and life long learning (see Strategic Plan: Taking Deakin University Forward 2004). This commitment in turn relates to one of the graduate attributes shaping curriculum development at the undergraduate level within the University: a capacity for lifelong learning and an appreciation of its necessity. Information literacy, information technology literacy and personal management skills can be seen, for example, as constituent capacities underlying the development of lifelong learning capabilities. In an increasingly virtual, networked, global world of work, being able to contribute productively and learn perpetually become crucial, with much of this learning taking place collaboratively in online professional development and training environments. Hence, the commitment to offering wholly online units is premised on a concomitant commitment to providing distinctive virtual teaching and learning environments that are designed and operated to foster lifelong learning capacities in undergraduate students, including those studying on campus. These capacities also involve the ability to articulate and reflect on the experiences of learning online. The gradual progress of academic teaching staff and other support parties towards the use of basic and extended online environments, has now been accelerated for some by the need for selecting, developing and operating wholly online units as part of their overall course and major offerings. The idea of replacing face to face contact with digital and online interaction presents significant challenges for staff and students in their approaches to teaching and learning.
This paper is a case study of the design and delivery of one of the first wholly online units in action at Deakin University. The design foundations of this unit, Research Methods in Psychology, were laid in previous work in developing online enhanced Resource Based Learning (RBL) in first year psychology. This antecedent work is outlined and related to the new wholly online unit development. The relationships between curriculum, pedagogy, assessment and the new digital media/online technology mix are described for the Research Methods in Psychology unit along with the contentious debate about the distinctive nature of a wholly online learning experience. The paper concludes by proposing an approach to permit a better understanding of the realities of the online learning experience as it relates to disciplinary concerns by drawing on recent work undertaken by the United Kingdom, Teaching and Learning Research Programme Enhancing Teaching Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses initiative.
Institutions are at various points on the continuum of implementing more contemporary learning environments incorporating e-learning. For example, Souleles (2004) studied trends in higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. He noted that most institutions are in the early stages of implementing virtual learning environments and teaching methods have not changed significantly with their introduction. In Briefing Paper 34 from the European Commission, Frutos (2000) discussed the emergent nature of virtual campuses and noted that virtual learning environments tend to be used in conjunction with other forms of study rather than as stand alone offerings.
Studying online is more advanced in some institutions. In particular, well established distance education (DE) institutions have been incorporating online learning in their offerings for many years. (e.g. Open University, UK; Athabasca University, Canada; Deakin University, University of New England, University of Southern Queensland, University of South Australia, Murdoch University, Australia.) DE institutions and others have contributed significantly to the body of knowledge about distance and online learning. Athabasca University for instance has produced the widely used, comprehensive book, Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Taylor (2001, p. 21) pointed to the need for a new delivery model called the Intelligent Flexible Learning Model which includes not only flexibility of time, place and pace, but also "highly refined materials", "advanced interactive delivery" and "institutional variable costs approaching zero".
At some institutions, it is possible to study whole degree courses fully online, or complete postgraduate training programs online. It is also possible to complete selected degree units wholly online, but these are more likely to be undertaken by students studying off campus. Such units may or may not be supplemented with print materials. As Caplan (2004) points out, definitions of what constitutes an online course vary from text based online enhanced courses to "open, distributed, dynamic, globally accessible, filtered, interactive" courses (p.178). Opportunities for on campus students to study online are available, but are generally part of a blended environment that includes face to face classes. Many recent conference and journal publications report work that focuses on these types of learning environments. (See for example Dalgarno & Harper, 2004; Herrington, Oliver & Reeves, 2003; Lefoe, Gunn & Hedberg, 2002; Oliver & McLoughlin, 2001; Peat, Franklin & Sims, 2002.) The point of difference in respect to Deakin is that studying a unit wholly online is mandated for all students at some time.
Segrave and Holt (2003) explored the changing nature of contemporary teaching and learning environments for excellence in professional education in higher education. Moves towards teaching and learning online are examined critically in this light. Segrave and Holt (2003, p.9) see contemporary learning environments as, "highly integrative, giving attention not only to integrating all of the needed/selected online functions (available in a learning management system, for example), but also to the integration of such virtual and physical aspects of the environment". In reporting research conducted on online enhanced Resource Based Learning (RBL) in first year psychology, Armatas, Holt and Rice (2003) cite the most recent review of higher education in Australia and its observations about the changing nature of the student population and concomitantly the changing nature of learning environments best able to support quality learning in the changing circumstances (see Issues Paper, Striving for quality: learning, teaching and scholarship, Higher Education at the Crossroads: A Review of Australian Higher Education, 2002, p.5). In this light, wholly online units in the Deakin context, with their absence of any form of face to face teaching, represent a new development in the emergence of contemporary learning environments in higher education nationally and internationally. (See Dodds, 2004.) The comforts of designing blended environments combining face to face teaching with digital and online enhancements are removed for on campus student cohorts. Similarly, the comfort of providing highly refined sets of printed study and reading materials for off campus students is also removed with demands for more of such material to be delivered digitally. Wholly online units have all of the attendant issues of the best ways for academic teachers to approach the design and operation of such environments. The move from blended to selected wholly online learning environments is arguably one of the leading edge, albeit not necessarily unproblematic, developments in contemporary learning experiences for on campus students in higher education.
Creating wholly online units challenges traditional notions of the various "categories" of learning from the on campus, lecture/ tutorial/ seminar/ laboratory based experience to the on campus e-moderated, digital media on demand experience. In thinking about the design of wholly online environments, there is a need to invoke a new vocabulary for a new era of contemporary learning environment development. This new vocabulary can assist teaching staff to design and work within online environments that are inclusive of the different modes of learning and which convey something of the new sense of the e-teaching and e-learning community.
The University's directions in e-learning are set out in the "Deakin Online" Management Plan 2003-2007. (See Deakin University, 2003.) In the plan, a wholly online unit is defined as follows:
At this stage, up to 30 units are being planned for wholly online development across all faculties. For most staff currently wrestling with the design and management of more elaborate uses of digital media and online environments, which in many cases are related to various forms of in person classroom teaching, the additional challenge of considering almost wholly online based environments has created much debate and discomfort. This debate includes the most appropriate types of existing units to offer online, and where none are readily apparent, what new types of units might be developed. For example, new units in wholly online form, are being developed in Arts: Sex, Crime and Social Justice in the Electronic Age, and Advertising: Designing Desires both with an Internet focus. There has been much soul searching about the efficacy of offering wholly online units to first year students, given the multiple demands on them to negotiate the transition to tertiary education, and the placement and rationale of such units in the overall context of course level curriculum design. Some of the existing comfort and confidence about the best ways of working with basic and extended online environments has given way to new critical design challenges. These include issues to do with potentially large numbers of students, irrespective of primary mode of study and location, undertaking most of their learning with digital resources and in online environments, without more traditional forms of teaching. Designing and operating wholly online learning environments requires a recognition of the changing role of the academic teacher in higher education, who now becomes not only a designer of the learning environment and facilitator of its use, but an evaluator of its impacts and an innovator in its ongoing development. This wider role inevitably places staff beyond their comfort zone. In this role, relationships with students and others critical in the educational experience; and with discipline knowledge and know how, are essential to the educational enterprise.
The unit is a challenging one; the workload is heavy and many students find the subject matter (research methods and statistics) difficult. It assumes and builds on knowledge of statistical techniques studied in first year psychology. One of the key requirements is for students to use the computer package called SPSS (the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for statistical analyses. The main challenges of learning and teaching the unit are outlined by Armatas (2003) in a case study of her work as a Deakin University Online Teaching and Learning Fellow during 2003:
It's taught in both on and off-campus modes... runs off-campus in semester one, then both on- and off-campus students in semester two...it is a challenging unit... mainly because many of them ...don't come into university with strong maths skills, so they find the learning of statistics quite challenging... they not only have to deal with mastering complex statistical tests and concepts about experimental design and ethics, but they also have to learn to use a computer package for statistical analyses. So what tends to happen is that...you have students learning about the statistical tests then they learn the package...they don't see how the two things relate, and you get this disassociation between...the tools and the methods which is not ideal.The key learning resources and online features of the unit are illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Relationship between teaching strategies, media learning resources and online features.
There are several major areas of digital and online development for the unit:
Reflecting on the use of asynchronous discussion and the possibility of using synchronous chat from the 2003 offering of the unit, Armatas (2003) observed in her case interview:
...with the discussion board, the plan was to ... post...critical or key questions...that tried to get them to come to grips with some of the conceptually difficult things with ... these tests, because they make basic misunderstandings about the tests...they haven't quite gone from the conceptual to the actual application, and they just need a little bit of help getting over that. (Armatas, 2003)Amongst the postings for the Semester 1 offering in 2004, there was also considerable discussion relating to the coursework, particularly around the time of the exam. Feedback from these postings about the course indicates that the general feeling amongst students is that although the unit was challenging and the online format new and sometimes confusing, successfully completing the unit gave them a sense of mastery and achievement. They also learnt new skills or applied/refined existing skills in a new context. Although this informal feedback is encouraging, the unit team wishes to pursue more rigorous research into the experiences of learning wholly online. With this in mind, a research project has been designed and approved for conduct on the second semester 2004 offering of the unit. It is grounded in recent work by Biggs (2003) and Ramsden (2003), which focuses on conceptions, approaches and outcomes to teaching and learning in higher education. This body of work has been further developed through the United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). The ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Program, Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses is a nation wide initiative to provide a stronger research base to help academic teaching staff enhance their undergraduate teaching. In reporting on the research program, Entwistle, McCune and Hounsell (2002) outline their conception of the nature of teaching and learning environments as relevant to undergraduate higher education. Their conceptual map of the "inner" teaching and learning environment covers course contexts, teaching and assessing content, staff student relationships and students and student cultures as focussed on specific institutional and disciplinary contexts. These components are the key points of intervention and change to enhance the teaching learning environment and hence enable quality learning. Their conceptual map is presented as a generic framework which appears to be premised on such environments being predominantly on campus, classroom based, with information and communications technologies forming part of the mix but not a key focus of research attention per se. In respect to contemporary higher education, their framework can be elaborated by having a greater focus on online learning environments. Our University's move into wholly online teaching and learning environments raises issues to do with the phenomena of both teachers' and learners' conceptions, approaches and outcomes in the strongly online mediated educational exchange. An understanding of these issues will make a major contribution to enhancing undergraduate education.
We originally started off with discussion spaces...dedicated to particular topics, so...if a student wasn't doing a weekly timetable, they could still come in and read discussion... maybe make contributions, even though they were perhaps three weeks behind... I didn't want them to have to read through everything...to get some benefit from what was there, so we started up one of these discussion areas on one of the early topics, and then I invited them to engage in some real time chat...I set up a little test where they could...actually check what time and date they would like to be involved in this. Nobody answered. Not one student wanted to be involved in real time discussion. So after a few more attempts and a negative response I thought well, perhaps this is not the way to go, and it soon became clear that these students had particular patterns of working in the environment. (Armatas, 2003)
As part of our proposed research, we plan to use two surveys developed by the UK Research Programme. They are designed to gauge students' experiences of learning in enhanced teaching learning environments:
In addition to the administration of the surveys, audit trails of students' usage of the resources will be examined to investigate patterns of use as a function of learning approaches, experience and expectations and computer attitudes. By measuring these characteristics in the student population using the online learning environment it will be possible to better understand characteristics that students bring to the learning environment that may influence their learning experience and learning outcomes. This in turn could assist educators to improve the quality of the on line learning experience and outcomes for their students.
Armatas, C. (2001). Evaluating the Psychology Electronic Warehouse (PEW). In R. Phillips et al, Report on Learner-Centred Evaluation of Computer-Facilitated Learning Projects in Higher Education. 47-56. Canberra: Australian Universities Teaching Committee. [verified 6 Nov 2004] http://www.tlc.murdoch.edu.au/archive/cutsd99/finalpdfreports/Ch4Armatas.pdf
Armatas, C., Holt, D.M. & Rice, M. (2003). Impacts of an online-supported resource-based learning environment: Does one size fit all? Distance Education, 24(2), 141-58.
Armatas, C. (2003). Audio interview, Deakin University Online Teaching and Learning Fellowship program. [verified 6 Nov 2004] http://www.deakin.edu.au/teachlearn/cases/
Armatas, C., Holt, D.M. & Rice, M. (In press). Designing distributed learning environments in support of professional development in the field of psychology. Educational Media International.
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University What the student does. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.
Boud, D. and Garrick, J. (Eds) (1999). Understanding Learning at Work. London: Routledge.
Candy, P., Crebert, G. & O'Leary, J. (1994). Developing Lifelong Learners through Undergraduate Education. Commissioned Report No. 28, Canberra, National Board of Employment, Education and Training.
Caplan, D. (2004). The development of online courses. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds). Theory and practice of online learning. Canada: Athabasca University. [verified 6 Nov 2004] http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/
Dalgarno, B. & Harper, B. (2004). User control and task authenticity for spatial learning in 3D environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 1-17. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet20/dalgarno.html
Deakin University. (2002). The Deakin Advantage: Guidelines for developing the attributes of a Deakin graduate 2002-2005.
Deakin University. (2003). "Deakin Online" Management Plan, 2003-2007.
Dodds, T. (Ed) (2004). Cyber-graduates download degrees. Australian Financial Review, 26 July, Edn 1.
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses. [viewed Jul 2004, not found 6 Nov 2004, see http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html]
e-Learning Centre (2004). Guide to e-learning. http://www.e-learningcentre.co.uk/eclipse/Resources/academic.htm [viewed July 2004]
Entwistle, N., McCune, V. and Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. ETL Project Occasional Report 1. [verified 14 Nov 2004] http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl/docs/ETLreport1.pdf
Frutos, M. (2000). Virtual Learning Environments for Higher Education. New Perspectives for Learning: Briefing Paper 34, The European Commission. http://www.pjb.co.uk/npl/bp34.htm
Herrington, J., Oliver, R. & Reeves, T.C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online environments, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1). 59-71. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/herrington.html
Holt, D.M., Rice, M. & Armatas, C. (2002). Issues arising from an online resource-based learning approach in first year psychology. In A. Williamson, C. Gunn, A. Young & T. Clear (Eds), Winds of change in the sea of learning. Proceedings 19th ASCILITE Conference, 287-298. Auckland, New Zealand, UNITEC. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/050.pdf
Holt, D.M. Rice, M. & Armatas, C. (2003). The emergence of an online learning community in first year tertiary studies in psychology. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 161-75. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/holt.html
Holt, D.M. & Segrave, S. (2003). Creating and sustaining quality e-learning environments of enduring value for teachers and learners. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker & J. Baron (Eds), Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings 20th ASCILITE Conference, 226-235. Adelaide. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/ascilite2003/docs/pdf/226.pdf
Issues Paper, Striving for quality: learning, teaching and scholarship, Higher Education at the Crossroads: A Review of Australian Higher Education (2002). Commonwealth Department of Education, Science & Training, [viewed May 2003, verified 6 Nov 2004]. http://www.backingaustraliasfuture.gov.au/publications/crossroads/default.htm
Lefoe, G., Gunn, C. & Hedberg, J. (2002). Recommendations for teaching in a distributed learning environment: The students' perspective. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 40-56. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet18/lefoe.html
Loyd, B.H. & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
Oliver, R. & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Exploring the practice and development of generic skills through Web-based learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10 (3), 307-325.
Peat, M., Franklin, S., Lewis, A. & Sims, R. (2002). Learning human biology: Student views on the usefulness of IT materials in an integrated curriculum. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 255-274. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet18/peat.html
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Segrave, S. & Holt, D.M. (2003). Contemporary learning environments: Designing e-learning for education in the professions. Distance Education, 24(1), 7-24.
Souleles, N. (2004). A prescriptive study of early trends in implementing e-learning in the UK Higher Education Sector. ITFORUM PAPER #78, 31 January. http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper78/paper78.htm
Taylor, J. (2001). The future of learning - learning for the future: Shaping the transition. Open Praxis. Bulletin of the International Council for Open and Distance Education, 2, 20-24. http://www.usq.edu.au/users/taylorj/publications_presentations/2001OpenPraxis.doc
|Please cite as: Armatas, C., Holt, D. & Rice, M. (2004). From online enhanced to wholly online: Reflections on e-learning developments in teaching psychology. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 78-87). Perth, 5-8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/armatas.html
© 2004 Christine Armatas, Dale Holt & Mary Rice
The authors assign to ASCILITE and educational non-profit institutions a non-exclusive licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to ASCILITE to publish this document on the ASCILITE web site (including any mirror or archival sites that may be developed) and in printed form within the ASCILITE 2004 Conference Proceedings. Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the authors.