|[ ASCILITE ]
[ 2004 Proceedings Contents ] |
Online discussions can be a major aspect of learning and teaching when a course is offered entirely online. Using online discussions can lead to new considerations of the tutor's role in relation to the students. This article outlines some of the research findings regarding online discussions, and considers these in relation to an online Masters course using a problem based approach. The course makes extensive use of online discussions. In this course, students are given the task of being the online moderator for a week to encourage active participation and development of their ideas through discussion. The article includes evaluation feedback from the students.
This article examines an online masters program in post-colonial studies of English literature from the perspectives of course design, the application of technology to enable student access, and the approach taken to managing online discussions, a key element in the learning process, involving students as online moderators. The process involved both the course tutor and the students having to learn new and unaccustomed roles - the students needed to learn to moderate an online discussion and the tutor needed to relinquish the accustomed level of control over the process to give the students the necessary freedom. The study will review issues in the literature, and relate these to the design and implementation of the online course and the role of online discussions. The role of the academic staff member in managing online discussions will be considered in relation to the student moderator role, and to staff time required. This course ran with a small number of students, however the process is considered to be scalable for larger numbers. The concluding section will consider the issues in the literature in comparison to the outcomes from course implementation and evaluation, with recommendations for using this approach with students.
The simple fact that online discussion is in writing has major implications. People tend to structure their ideas before writing, which is not always necessary in the free flow of spoken discussion. Many people who find it difficult to participate in oral discussion appreciate the opportunity to reflect and to contribute in writing. A comparison of online and face to face tutorials found online discussion to be less spontaneous, but more reflective and demonstrative of a higher quality of learning (Newman, Johnson, Webb, & Cochrane, 1997).
As in classroom discussions the role played by the tutor is likely to be pivotal to the process. Online discussions may be strongly influenced by the modelling role played by the tutor as this can influence the depth, frequency and nature of student input (McAlpine, 2000). Online discussion, used effectively, can play a critical role in supporting and shaping the students' cognitive processes. Salmon (1998, pp 6-7) suggests the following list of cognitive processes that could be developed and applied through online discussion:
Online discussion needs to be considered in relation to the rest of the course, as the role it plays in the learning process will influence the direction taken by the discussion. One possibility is to focus ongoing discussion around course topics, with frequent new discussion starters, such as every week (for example, McAlpine & Ashcroft, 2002). Other possibilities include problem based formats in which the students work in groups online to resolve problem issues through dialogue and the development of a group response (for example, Oliver & Omari, 1999). This form of learning can play a key role in developing higher order cognitive skills through discussion and problem solving as a group process (Boud & Feletti, 1997) and in developing metacognitive skills that may be effective in transferring learning and problem solving and teamwork processes to new situations (Oriogun, 2003).
As students develop skills in using online discussion as a learning tool, the pedagogical role played by the tutor may change. To foster the development of cognitive capability and metacognitive skills through active learning processes, students may be given some of the facilitation role (Wiesenberg & Hutton, 2000). This may encourage greater participation in the discussion, prevent domination of the discussion by a few individuals, and lead to greater online collaboration among students (Salmon, 2000). To achieve this outcome, students need to develop skills in the use of and participation in online discussions. A key aspect of this is expert modelling of appropriate processes to be carried out by the online tutor (Wiesenberg & Hutton, 2000).
Online discussion can play a critical role in enabling students to construct a deep understanding of course topics. Cognitive development can occur progressively through ongoing discussion by sharing knowledge and points of view, and reflecting on the perspectives brought to the discussion by other students and the tutor. The written discussion process requires the students to think carefully and to construct their arguments, and the written record demonstrates to the students and the tutor how their understanding is developing. Pedagogical roles facilitate this process. These can include diversifying the tutor role to include students as moderators of the online discussion. This can provide a deeper learning experience for the students, enabling them to shape cognitive development through peer discussion and critique.
The course was divided into five modules each of which addressed a 'problem' in post-colonial theory and various texts were examined to draw out the literary and cultural issues revolving around each issue. These issues includes the terms 'post-colonial'; representation; resistance; language; and history. The course demonstrated the applicability of problem based learning to the humanities. Although not a strictly functional problem based course, since the problems were not amenable to a solution, the issues presented 'problems' in that they were the site of considerable argument and debate in the field. In this way, the problematic nature of the issues enhanced the potential for independent thought and the articulation of individual positions on the issues. This approach to critical issues in the field proved to be an extremely useful way of developing critical and independent thinking.
The learning outcomes of the course involve high level cognitive and interpretative abilities. At its completion the students should not only be able to identify various critical issues in post-colonial studies but should be able to assess the competing positions in debates about these issues, state a position on the issue and identify the ways in which it affects the production of post-colonial cultural texts. They will be able to recognise that representation itself is not a simple matter of picturing the world but is a complex ideological process of great significance in cultural communication. In keeping with learning outcomes in postgraduate courses, the students are given an opportunity to develop and refine their ability to think independently, form critical judgments and express their ideas articulately. The principle of problem based learning as it was adapted for this course proved to be ideal for the development of these outcomes. The importance of online discussion was confirmed by the high proportion of marks allocated to it in the assessment of the course. Students received 30% of total marks for online discussion; 20% for moderating a week's discussion and 50% for a major essay.
The discussion on moderation started with a flurry but petered out towards the midpoint of the course as students became more familiar with the process and more taken up with the demands of the course tasks. A prominent early concern of moderators revolved around 'netiquette'. One student berated her moderator for not replying directly to her posting and this elicited some intervention from the tutor concerning appropriate tone in online discussion.
Its quite an intensive process getting online everyday, analysing everything, coming up with new content and keeping ideas on track with questions - allow lots of spare time the week you're on! I think posing questions to the group is essential, and you should spend time focussing on what you want to achieve from them - broadening the debate, or fine tuning ideas...For this reason it is important that in an asynchronous discussion the moderators see this as a week long assessment activity (whereas discussion itself is a session long assessment activity), rather than submitted essay. The experience of moderating expressed by the students would suggest that the moderation works better as a learning activity than a polished paper. The written submission at the beginning is still important because it is the basis on which discussion proceeds. But when a student moderates a discussion the process of interacting, and the active engagement it entails, is the important learning experience. Online moderating requires the continual management of the discussion during the week, a moderator ideally logging on every day and his or her effectiveness in managing the discussion often determined by the depth of knowledge of the week's topic.
This is precisely what happened when students posted new material. The offering of new material by both the moderator and discussants during the week provided substantial evidence of the superiority of this form of discussion over a face to face seminar. Such new material - online essays, news items or images - was a great stimulus to discussion. Invariably, students provided attachments of topical issues that constructively adapted the problems being discussed to immediately relevant events. The reflection demanded by online discussion was enhanced by added material which ensured that discussion remained relevant and lively.
I agree that it is important to get into the thread early. As a moderator it is difficult to keep going back to questions which have been dealt with earlier when you are trying to move forward in the discussion. That said, sometimes concepts need to be revised as not everyone can be on the "same page" all the time.
Moderating can be hard because in a short space of time you have to cover a lot of ground and it can take time to get use to different styles of writing and expression in the class. Further, the limitations that present themselves as a result of not being able to thrash out an issue with everyone present can slow things down a little. That said, the great thing is that you can ponder people's ideas.The danger in moderation, particularly with a small group, is that the moderator feels obliged to respond to every posting. One moderator in particular valiantly tried to mention everyone, and respond to individual postings. But this tended to become a two way response rather than a multi-levelled conversation between the various participants. One of the more engaging descriptions of the intensity and motivation of the learning experience involved in moderating a week's discussion was provided by a student who says:
I would come home from work exhausted, but then after reading your comments and beginning to type my own responses, I'd slowly wake up. And then I couldn't go to sleep because I'd still be thinking about what people had said! Then the next day would come and I'd do it again... I would suggest that you do get into things early and research your topic properly before your week of moderating, knowing the novel well really helped me to pull the points together - as you don't want to be learning this while trying to moderate because writing up posts are quite time consuming.
Students responded positively to questions about support, resources and guidance for online learning. The open ended questions revealed some difficulties, such as slow downloads and orientation to the new technology and different mode of learning. These, however, were seen as relatively minor and were balanced with positive comments about the process.
|9||The problem/project topic had some features that were familiar to me.||1||5||2|
|10||I found the problem/project topic appropriately challenging.||7||1|
|11||The problem/project enabled me to build on knowledge I already had.||3||3||1||1|
|12||I developed new knowledge by working on the problem/project.||7||1|
|13||I learned little that was new by working on the problem/project.||1||7|
|14||The method of addressing issues as problems was a useful aid to learning.||1||6||1|
|15||The fact that the problems might not have a specific solution proved to be a difficulty for me.||1||1||4||2|
|* Strongly agree SA; Agree A; Not sure/does not apply NS; Disagree D; Strongly disagree SD|
The constructivist approach to course design is reflected in the problem based aspect of the course design, and the knowledge construction processes associated with problem solving through online discussion and writing. Table 1 shows the questions related the problem based aspects of the course design. These questions are designed to reflect the cognitive processes of associating new knowledge with prior knowledge (q. 9), fostering elaboration of existing knowledge structures through activities that are appropriately challenging (qs. 10-11), and constructing new knowledge through problem solving (qs. 12 and 14). As some students find open ended problem situations unsettling, question 15 was included to see if this caused difficulties. One student, out of eight, indicated that this was a difficulty.
In general the feedback from the questionnaires was positive. Most students agreed that the problems had familiar topics, were appropriately challenging, enabled them to build on existing knowledge, and to develop new knowledge. Two students (25% of this survey) found the problem topics unfamiliar, and two did not agree that they were building on existing knowledge. In the open ended comments, two students indicated that they found the theory to be new and difficult, which could explain these responses.
Most students agreed that the problem based approach was a useful aid to learning. There was one disagreement with this, possibly the same student who had difficulty with the open ended nature of the problems. This response is to be expected as it is always likely that some students will not appreciate problems without definite solutions. A higher percentage of negative responses to questions 14 and 15 would have indicated that some design changes were needed, possibly by including more specific guidelines. A student who, in the open ended comments indicated that the theoretical articles were particularly challenging, also indicated that reading other students interpretations also helped. This provides some confirmation of the effectiveness of the written discussion method used in the course.
|18||The online moderation was a valuable learning experience.||5||3|
|19||I learned a lot from other people's online moderation.||7||1|
|20||The questions for online discussion were a useful aid to learning.||6||2|
Table 2 presents the questions relating to student moderation. Responses to these questions were unambiguously positive. Responses to an open ended question on problems, if any, with the moderation process indicated:
the process worked well but was really hard work as the moderator for the week could spend 2 - 3 hours per day online;The final open ended questions asked the students to elaborate further on any of the previous issues. Points made by individual students include:
some students hadn't engaged with the readings which meant their comments were speculative;
while the process was time consuming, a good understanding was needed to make thoughtful postings. This meant that people took more care than they would in a class discussion, and that they have a great resource of course notes to refer to.
It is more work than a face to face course. The model should be used in other schools within the universityMany students made strongly positive comments about the course tutor (BA) for his interest in the students, his depth of knowledge of the course material, and for making the course an enriching experience.
The course was really enjoyable.
An advantage of online learning is having to formulate thoughts in advance to present them in writing. This led to a deepening of analytical and critical skills. Depth of learning has been much greater than in a face to face class, yet the social interaction of being in a class group was missed. Improvement is intellectual and the students lose out on the social/psychological benefits of being in a classroom.
It was surprising how much was learned from this method. Everybody in the group was very motivated and articulate in postings to the online discussion.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. I. (Eds) (1997). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Volume II, A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McAlpine, I. (2000). Collaborative learning online. Distance Education, 21(1), 66-80.
McAlpine, I. & Ashcroft, W. (2002). Turning points: Learning from online discussions in an off-campus course. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds), Proceedings of Ed-Media 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, 24-29 June, Denver, Colorado. (pp. 1251-1257).
Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484-495.
Oliver, R. & Omari, A. (1999). Using online technologies to support problem based learning: Learners' responses and perceptions. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 58-79. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet15/oliver.html
Oriogun, P. K. (2003). Towards understanding online learning levels of engagement using the SQUAD approach to CMC discourse. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 371-387. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/oriogun.html
Salmon, G. (1998). Developing learning through effective online moderation. Active Learning, 9(December), 3-8.
Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan Page.
Wiesenberg, F. & Hutton, S. (2000). Quality online participation: Learning in cmc classrooms. In Working Knowledge: Productive learning at work conference proceedings, 10-13 December, Sydney, Australia, University of Technology Sydney. pp. 495-502. [verified 9 Oct 2004] http://www.oval.uts.edu.au/working_papers/wkpapers/worknow64.pdf
|Please cite as: Ashcroft, B. & McAlpine, I. (2004). Student moderators in online discussions. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 88-94). Perth, 5-8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/ashcroft.html|
© 2004 Bill Ashcroft & Iain McAlpine
The authors assign to ASCILITE and educational non-profit institutions a non-exclusive licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to ASCILITE to publish this document on the ASCILITE web site (including any mirror or archival sites that may be developed) and in printed form within the ASCILITE 2004 Conference Proceedings. Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the authors.